| Review: Yann Martel, Life of Pi |
Everyone who pays attention to books knows about it
by now. A sixteen year old guy nicknamed Pi is trapped at sea in a
lifeboat with a ferocious Bengal tiger, a dilemma that must seem as
unending to Pi as the ocean of time and water on which these unlikely
companions float across the rolling and capricious world of the Atlanticas
ceaseless indeed as the mathematical symbol that happens to be his
name. The book, of course, is the novel by Canadian writer Yann Martel
entitled Life of Pi, winner of the Man
Booker Prize for fiction.
Narrated throughout by Pi, whose full name is Piscine Patel (his parents
named him after a pool, Piscine Molitor, in Paris), the initial segment
of the novel is full of animal lore picked up from his experiences
in the zoo owned by his father in Pondicherry, India before the shipwreck
in which Pis father, mother and brother perish attempting to
migrate to Canada. Though Martel seems to be marking time in this
segment, indulging a long hesitation before venturing upon his central
story, much of the lore is downright engaging. We learn, for instance,
that animals, being territorial creatures, wont desire to escape
from a biologically sound zoo. It becomes their territory. When they
do escape, it is not to somewhere else
but from some defective condition. About
some of the creatures on the other side of the moats and bars, the
human visitors, we learn that their behavior can be little short of
vicious: deliberately feeding razor blades, broken bottles, ballpoint
pens and the like to the animals. Even kindly visitors, probably the
majority, frequently cause gastric problems in the animals by offering
various tidbits that break the careful diets prepared by zoologists.
To be sure, elements of this segment may be germane to the behavior
of animals in the main story, but only glancingly.
More relevant are passages in the same segment that render the character
and personality of Pi himself, especially through his flirtations
with religion. In these, he is catholic with a small c,
having sought out instruction in Christian, Hindu and Islamic beliefs
and practices and declared himself to be an adherent of all three
religions, a kind of universalist of faith. As for non-believers,
he feels simply that they are missing out on the better story.
In the more earthly aspects of his personality, he is given to thoughts
that are wise in the way Thoreau was wise: a tie is a noose,
and inverted though it is, it will hang a man nonetheless if hes
not careful. Thats Pi, not Henry David.
The meat of the novelboth metaphorically and literallyis
the tale of the ordeal in the lifeboat, which is inhabited initially
by a zebra, a hyena, an orangutan, and of course by Pi and the tiger
(endowed with the name Richard Parker by a mistake in a clerks
record-keeping). Vividly rendered in all their grimness are the events
through which the less imposing animals are transformed into sustenance
for each other and finally for Richard Parker and thus into temporary
safety for Pi, a safety which is only too short-lived on this grueling
voyage of more than seven months. To sustain himself and keep his
boat-mate from transforming him as well into food, Pi is forced to
extremes of effort and ingenuity: to constant fishing with the emergency
supplies on the lifeboat, to snaring sea turtles when he can, to catching
rainwater, and to other subterfuges of survival. The implicit paradox
of his situation is that Pi would never have survived the ordeal at
sea without the constant and awesome menace of his fierce companion.
By the threat of a gory death he has been given his life. It is fitting,
then, that he can declare afterward his love for Richard Parker.
In the dramatized coda, Pi raises knotty speculations based on the
foregoing events, speculations which are not to be given away here
except to say that they go full circle to Pis thoughts on those
various religions of his, to questions regarding the better
story.
|
|