|
evocation, not explanation
Recently, we caught the tail end of a Charlie Rose interview with
Elmore Leonard, whom many people think of as a hard-boiled crime writer.
Which he is, of course. But actually hes more than that: a thinking
writer whose work is admired by serious novelists like
the British writer Martin Amis and others.
An example of Leonards thinking: If it sounds like writing,
rewrite it. Now thats a piece of advice to chew on since
it goes to all the elements of fiction. But what can it mean? Doesnt
writing inevitably sound like writing?
Well, no. Weak writing sounds like writing. And sometimes strong
writing of, say, the Jamesian cast, which lives on deliberation
and circumlocution in its generally successful quest to evoke the
finest filaments of human experience.
As a practical matter, though, we take Leonards dictum to
mean that we must not merely make announcements ABOUT the actions
and speeches and thoughts and feelings of our characters, that we
must capture the feelings, etc. themselves. In short, we take Leonard
to mean the sort of thing weve been advising on this site
all along, evocation, not explanation. No easy trick, to be sure.
But thats the capacity fiction writers must cultivate.
|